It’s Friday and that means it’s time for my 18th mystery object. This week I have picked a skull (I can hear the groans already), but it’s a cute one and when I asked Melissa (who is not a biologist) what it is she got it in three guesses. I asked her how she worked it out and her reply was ”I thought about it and it worked”, which speaks volumes about the principles behind identification methods.
So, I invite you to think about this and see if you too can make it work:
So, what is it? Answers in the comments section below – I’ll also do my best to respond to any questions, but tomorrow is a busy day for me, so I might not get much opportunity. Remember – think about it and it might just work.
P.S. if you get it early on I might turn your answer white to give others a chance of working it out for themselves.
On Friday I gave you this image and asked you to identify what it is:
I am pleased to say that it led you a merry chase before we got to the correct answer – but very well done to Debi, Jim and especially Woolgatherer for getting there! It is indeed a Read more »
On Friday I gave you a palaeontological mystery object and asked you to choose what you thought it was from a poll:
As it turns out, you did pretty well, with 60% of you selecting the correct category (with a couple of you making comments which went into greater detail). The object in indeed a piece of fossil Read more »
It’s Friday again and I feel it may be time to introduce an object from the area of my original training (that’s palaeontology). Imagine that you’re me, searching through the drawers in a museum and you come across this:
What is it from? It looks scaly, but that’s about all you can tell from looking at it. Based on the scales, what do you think this is most likely to be?
Make your selection in the poll below – if you think you can give a more detailed description that those offered in the poll please add it in the comments section below.
On Friday I gave you a bit of a change from museum specimens and presented you with this:
Everyone managed to get the identification to at least within the Order level (it’s in the Orthoptera), which is good going when dealing with insects. The hard bit came down to whether it was a cricket or grasshopper. Now, the photo does not show the most important feature for distinguish between these two types of orthopteran: it’s the antennae length that gives it away (grasshoppers have short antennae, crickets have long antennae). Colour is not really important (sorry KateKatV).
That said, the vivid green colour, speckled appearance, lack of wings and characteristics shape of the ovipositor (curved bit at the back which means this is a female) are a give-away for those who are familiar with this particular beastie (and for those who use Google image to help with their identifications). It is in fact a Read more »
Last week I let Harrison pick an object that proved a bit too difficult (although perhaps I could have been more generous with the clues I gave…). This week I am giving you something that is actually alive and commonly found in gardens in the UK – so it should be a doddle to identify:
Simple questions – what species is it (binomial name gets you kudos) and what gender is it?
Answers in the comments section below – but I’m afraid I won’t be able to respond to comments this week. Good luck!
jdc325’s weblog
Bad Science: Nutritionism, Remedies, Denialism, maybe some Religion
mental indigestion
“mental indigestion” is the Science Blog of Dr Jim, a UK-based research scientist; helping to make science more digestible
Not Exactly Rocket Science
the latest scientific discoveries interesting to everyone by beating jargon, confusion and elitism with the stick of good writing
Pharyngula
Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal
Richard Wiseman's blog
Psychologist, magician, and author of The Luck Factor and Quirkology posts on quirky mind stuff.
ScienceBlogs
Where the world discusses science. 70 blogs, 114,650+ posts, and 1,744,070+ comments
Secular Thought for the Day
A daily dose of rational thought about topical subjects from a moral or ethical perspective